المستشار الدكتور / جاسم يوسف الفهد
خبير دراسات والانظمة والكودات والية التطبيق والمتابعة
رئيس نادي المستشارين المحترفين
ايميل: ceo@consult-club.com
*إذا كانت منظمتك مهتمة بالاستشارة للإصلاح، فلا تتردد في التواصل مع نادي المستشارين المحترفين . نحن هنا لمساعدتك ودعمك في تنفيذ الإصلاحات الصحيحة واستراتيجيات التنمية. نجاحك هو أولويتنا.
06 Nov. 2023
جهاز تعزيز الإنتاجية في أستراليا هو هيئة مستقلة تسعى إلى تحسين الكفاءة والأداء لدى المؤسسات الحكومية والقطاع العام
يقوم الجهاز بتقديم توجيهات وتوصيات لتحسين الخدمات الحكومية وزيادة الإنتاجية
يتميز بالشفافية والاستدامة والتفرغ لمهمته في تحسين الأداء وتعزيز الكفاءة
Enhancing government efficiency is critical for better public services
Australia's Productivity Commission plays a crucial role in assessing and recommending reforms to enhance government efficiency
It serves as a model for other nations seeking to optimize their public sector performance and service delivery.
تعريف جهاز تعزيز جهاز الإنتاجية في أستراليا (Productivity Commission)
جهاز تعزيز الإنتاجية في أستراليا (Productivity Commission) هو هيئة مستقلة تأسست في عام 1998 بهدف تعزيز الكفاءة والإنتاجية في المؤسسات الحكومية والقطاع العام. يعتبر هذا الجهاز من الأجهزة الرائدة على مستوى العالم في مجال تحسين الأداء الحكومي وزيادة الفعالية.
أهم مهمات الجهاز:
تقديم التوجيهات والتوصيات: يقوم Productivity Commission بإجراء الأبحاث والتحليلات اللازمة لفحص أداء المؤسسات الحكومية والقطاع العام. يعتمد على البيانات والأدلة لتقديم توجيهات وتوصيات تهدف إلى تحسين الخدمات وزيادة الكفاءة.
التحليل الاقتصادي: يقوم بتقديم تحليل اقتصادي دقيق لقياس الأثر الاقتصادي للسياسات والبرامج الحكومية. يساعد في تحديد السياسات الفعالة والتكاليف الاقتصادية.
مراجعة السياسات: يقوم الجهاز بمراجعة السياسات الحكومية والقوانين لضمان أنها تلبي معايير الكفاءة والفعالية. يعمل على تقديم توصيات لتحسين هذه السياسات.
تشجيع المنافسة: يدعم Productivity Commission المنافسة في القطاعات المختلفة من خلال تقديم توصيات لإزالة العقبات وتحفيز الابتكار والكفاءة.
التواصل والشفافية: يقوم الجهاز بنشر تقاريره ونتائج أبحاثه بشكل علني، مما يساهم في تعزيز الشفافية وتشجيع النقاش والمشاركة.
كان لجهاز تعزيز الإنتاجية في أستراليا دور كبير في تحسين أداء المؤسسات الحكومية وتعزيز الكفاءة الاقتصادية في البلاد. وهو يمثل نموذجًا جيدًا للدول الأخرى التي تسعى لتحسين أداء المؤسسات الحكومية وتعزيز الفعالية والإنتاجية.
للاستفادة من تجربة الاسترالية في تحسين فعالية وكفاءة المؤسسات الحكومية، يمكن للكويت اتباع الخطوات التالية:
دراسة التجارب الناجحة: يجب على الكويت دراسة تجربة الاسترالية بعناية، والتعمق في فهم السياسات والإصلاحات التي تم تنفيذها وكيف تم تطبيقها.
تخصيص موارد: ينبغي للكويت تخصيص موارد مالية وبشرية كافية لتنفيذ الإصلاحات والمبادرات اللازمة.
التعاون الدولي: يجب تعزيز التعاون مع الحكومة الاسترالية والمؤسسات الدولية ذات الخبرة في مجال تحسين الأداء الحكومي.
تخصيص أهمية للتقييم والمراقبة: يجب على الكويت وضع آليات فعالة لقياس أداء المؤسسات الحكومية وتقييم تأثير الإصلاحات.
تطوير القوانين واللوائح: قد يتعين على الكويت إعادة النظر في القوانين واللوائح الحالية وتحديثها بما يتناسب مع الاحتياجات الحالية.
تبني أفضل الممارسات: يجب تبني أفضل الممارسات الدولية في مجال تحسين الأداء الحكومي وتطبيقها على نطاق واسع.
التوعية والتدريب: ينبغي توجيه جهود لتوعية الموظفين وتطوير مهاراتهم من خلال برامج تدريبية مستدامة.
الاستدامة: الكفاءة والتحسين يجب أن تكون عملية مستدامة ومستمرة.
قياس النجاح: يجب تحديد مؤشرات الأداء والمعايير لقياس النجاح ومتابعة التقدم.
التشجيع على الإبداع والابتكار: يجب تشجيع الموظفين على الابتكار واقتراح حلاً لتحسين الأداء.
التعاون الجاد والالتزام بتنفيذ هذه الخطوات يمكن أن يساعد الكويت في تحقيق تحسين كبير في فعالية وكفاءة مؤسساتها الحكومية.
The role of Australia's Productivity Commission to Enhanc Organizational Performance
The Productivity Commission is an independent agency in Australia that focuses on improving the efficiency and effectiveness of government policies and programs. While it doesn't directly "fix" organizations, it plays a crucial role in driving improvements in various ways:
Research and Analysis: The Productivity Commission conducts in-depth research and analysis to assess the performance of various government programs and sectors. This analysis can identify areas where organizations or sectors are underperforming.
Policy Recommendations: Based on their research, the Productivity Commission provides recommendations to the government on how to improve policies, regulations, and programs. These recommendations can lead to changes in how organizations operate.
Benchmarking and Best Practices: The Commission often compares the performance of Australian organizations with international best practices. By highlighting areas where Australia lags behind, it encourages organizations to adopt better practices.
Regulatory Reform: The Productivity Commission may recommend regulatory changes to enhance competition and efficiency in sectors like telecommunications, energy, or healthcare, which can lead to organizations within those sectors improving their operations.
Cost-Benefit Analysis: The Commission conducts cost-benefit analyses for various policies and programs. These analyses can highlight areas where resources are not being efficiently allocated and can inform decisions on resource allocation and investment.
Transparency and Accountability: By publishing its findings and recommendations, the Productivity Commission promotes transparency and accountability within organizations and government agencies. It encourages them to address shortcomings in their operations.
Evaluation of Programs: The Commission evaluates the effectiveness of specific government programs. This evaluation can lead to changes in how these programs are designed and delivered by the organizations responsible for them.
In summary, the Productivity Commission influences the way organizations operate indirectly by providing evidence-based recommendations, advocating for best practices, and driving policy changes to improve the overall efficiency and effectiveness of government programs and sectors.
How Australia's Productivity Commission contact and work with Organizations
Australia's Productivity Commission typically contacts and works with organizations through a structured process. Here's a general overview:
Request for Information: The Productivity Commission may issue requests for information or conduct studies to gather data and insights from various organizations.
Consultations: They often engage in consultations with stakeholders, including government agencies, industry associations, and businesses. This can involve public hearings, meetings, or written submissions.
Data Collection: The commission collects relevant data and conducts research to understand the performance and challenges of organizations within a specific sector.
Analysis: They thoroughly analyze the data and information collected to assess the efficiency and effectiveness of organizations.
Draft Reports: The commission prepares draft reports based on its findings, which may include recommendations for improvements.
Public Release: Once a draft report is completed, it is made public. Interested parties, including organizations, have the opportunity to provide feedback.
Final Report: After considering feedback, the Productivity Commission finalizes its report, including any recommendations.
Implementation: If the report includes recommendations, organizations, particularly government bodies, may work on implementing these to enhance their performance.
Monitoring and Review: The Productivity Commission may continue to monitor and review the performance of organizations to ensure that the suggested improvements are being realized.
Engagement: Throughout the process, the commission maintains open lines of communication with organizations and stakeholders.
The specific methods of contact and collaboration can vary depending on the focus of the inquiry and the organizations involved.
How Australia's Productivity Commission Conduct institutional reforms and mechanisms
The Productivity Commission of Australia employs various institutional reforms and mechanisms to enhance productivity and efficiency across government organizations. Some key mechanisms and reforms include:
Policy Reviews: The Productivity Commission conducts comprehensive policy reviews and inquiries in various sectors, such as education, healthcare, infrastructure, and more. These reviews assess the efficiency and effectiveness of government policies and recommend improvements.
Public Consultation: The Commission engages in public consultation to gather input and feedback from stakeholders, including government agencies, industry representatives, and the general public. This participatory approach ensures a broad range of perspectives are considered in policy recommendations.
Data-Driven Analysis: The Commission relies on robust data and evidence-based analysis to inform its policy recommendations. This includes collecting and analyzing data on productivity, economic performance, and public sector efficiency.
Benchmarking: Comparative benchmarking against international best practices is a common approach used by the Commission. They assess how Australia performs compared to other countries and regions, identifying areas where improvements can be made.
Regulatory Impact Analysis: The Commission emphasizes regulatory impact analysis to assess the costs and benefits of government regulations. This ensures that regulations are designed to achieve their intended outcomes while minimizing unnecessary burdens.
Market Studies: The Commission conducts market studies to identify anti-competitive practices and regulatory barriers. This contributes to more competitive markets and efficient resource allocation.
Policy Advice: The Commission provides policy advice to government agencies, offering recommendations for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of government operations. This advice is often evidence-based and supported by rigorous research.
Research and Publications: The Commission publishes research reports, working papers, and policy papers that provide insights into productivity and efficiency challenges. These publications are valuable resources for policymakers and the public.
Transparency and Accountability: The Commission operates with a high degree of transparency and accountability. Its findings and recommendations are made publicly available, and it is subject to parliamentary oversight.
Capacity Building: The Commission plays a role in building the capacity of government agencies to better assess and enhance their own performance.
Continuous Monitoring: The Commission continuously monitors and evaluates policy outcomes and the implementation of its recommendations. This ensures that policies and reforms are having the desired impact.
Engagement with Stakeholders: The Commission engages with a wide range of stakeholders, including industry associations, academic institutions, and government agencies, to gather insights and perspectives.
These institutional reforms and mechanisms collectively contribute to Australia's efforts to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of government organizations. They provide a blueprint for how other countries and regions can work towards similar objectives and drive productivity gains in the public sector.
Real-Life Success Stories: How the Productivity Commission Transforms Organizations in Health Sector
The Productivity Commission in Australia has played a role in improving various organizations and sectors through its research and policy recommendations. Here's an example:
Example: Health Sector Reform
In Australia, the health sector has been a significant focus of the Productivity Commission's work. The Commission conducted a comprehensive review of the health system to identify inefficiencies and areas in need of reform. They found that the system was complex, costly, and not delivering the best value for money. Some specific issues included:
Fragmentation: The health system had multiple layers of government involvement and a lack of coordination between them, resulting in inefficiencies and gaps in care.
Cost Overruns: Health expenditure was escalating rapidly, and there was a need to control costs while maintaining quality care.
Inequities: There were disparities in healthcare access and outcomes among different population groups.
Based on these findings, the Productivity Commission made a series of recommendations to address these issues and improve the health system:
Coordination: They recommended better coordination between federal and state governments and between different parts of the health system.
Funding Reforms: Proposals for more efficient funding arrangements and pricing mechanisms.
Quality and Safety: Emphasis on improving the quality and safety of healthcare services.
Competition and Choice: Encouraging competition in service delivery to improve efficiency.
Preventive Care: Strategies to shift focus towards preventive healthcare to reduce long-term costs.
The government used these recommendations as a basis for reforming the healthcare system. The changes implemented as a result of these recommendations aimed to improve the efficiency of healthcare organizations, reduce costs, enhance patient care, and address disparities in access. This example illustrates how the Productivity Commission can influence government policies and reforms, leading to improvements in organizations and sectors. While the Commission doesn't directly fix organizations, it provides a framework for addressing issues and driving changes in how they operate.
Real-Life Success Stories: How the Productivity Commission Transforms Organizations in building and construction
The Productivity Commission in Australia has played a significant role in assessing and improving the efficiency and performance of organizations in various sectors, including building and construction. Here's an example of how the Productivity Commission can help fix organizations in the construction industry:
Example: Enhancing Productivity in the Construction Sector
Issue: The construction industry in Australia faces challenges related to productivity, cost overruns, project delays, and inefficiencies. The government and stakeholders are concerned about the industry's performance and its impact on housing affordability and infrastructure development.
Role of the Productivity Commission:
Research and Analysis: The Productivity Commission conducts in-depth research and analysis of the construction sector's performance. This includes assessing the factors contributing to inefficiencies, cost escalations, and delays.
Benchmarking: The commission compares Australia's construction industry with international best practices and benchmarks. It identifies areas where Australia lags behind and where improvements can be made.
Consultation: The commission engages with key stakeholders, including government agencies, industry associations, construction companies, architects, and civil engineers. They seek input, feedback, and insights to better understand the challenges faced by the sector.
Regulatory and Policy Assessment: The commission evaluates existing regulations, building codes, and policies related to the construction industry. They assess whether these regulations facilitate or hinder productivity and innovation.
Outcomes and Recommendations:
Policy Recommendations: Based on their research, benchmarking, and stakeholder consultations, the Productivity Commission develops a set of policy recommendations. These recommendations could include simplifying regulatory processes, promoting the use of innovative construction techniques and materials, and encouraging digital transformation in the industry.
Skills and Training: The commission may recommend initiatives to improve the skills and training of the construction workforce, ensuring they are up to date with the latest practices and technologies.
Incentives for Innovation: To promote innovation, the commission might suggest providing incentives for construction companies that adopt new technologies, sustainable practices, and efficient project management.
Transparency and Reporting: The commission emphasizes the importance of transparency in the construction sector. It may recommend the development of a reporting framework that obligates construction companies to report on project progress, cost control, and adherence to timelines.
Performance Monitoring: The commission advocates for the ongoing monitoring of the sector's performance against the recommendations. This includes regular assessments of productivity, cost control, and project completion times.
Industry Collaboration: Encouraging collaboration between different stakeholders in the construction industry, such as contractors, architects, engineers, and material suppliers, to streamline processes and enhance efficiency.
In this way, the Productivity Commission helps fix organizations in the construction sector by providing evidence-based recommendations, driving policy changes, and promoting best practices to improve productivity and performance in the industry.
Real-Life Success Stories: How the Productivity Commission Transforms Organizations in Education
The Productivity Commission in Australia plays a crucial role in assessing and improving organizations within the education sector. Here's an example of how the Productivity Commission can help enhance education organizations:
Example: Improving the Efficiency of Tertiary Education Institutions
Issue: Tertiary education institutions in Australia are facing challenges related to efficiency, quality, and cost-effectiveness. There is a need to ensure that universities and other educational organizations are providing high-quality education while managing costs.
Role of the Productivity Commission:
Data Collection and Analysis: The Productivity Commission collects data on the performance and efficiency of tertiary education institutions. This includes metrics like student outcomes, graduation rates, resource utilization, and financial sustainability.
Benchmarking: The commission compares Australian universities with international benchmarks to identify areas where they can improve. They assess best practices in teaching, research, and administration.
Stakeholder Engagement: Engaging with stakeholders, including universities, students, academics, and government bodies, to understand the challenges and opportunities in the sector.
Regulatory Review: The commission evaluates the regulatory framework governing tertiary education to assess whether it promotes or hinders efficiency and quality. This may include reviewing accreditation processes, funding models, and governance structures.
Outcomes and Recommendations:
Performance Metrics: The Productivity Commission recommends the development and implementation of key performance indicators for universities, emphasizing measures of teaching quality, research impact, and student outcomes.
Funding Models: The commission may propose changes to the funding models for tertiary education. For example, they might recommend performance-based funding to reward institutions that excel in teaching and research.
Administrative Efficiency: Encouraging universities to streamline administrative processes and reduce bureaucracy, leading to cost savings.
Digital Transformation: Promoting the use of technology and digital learning tools to enhance the delivery of education and reduce costs.
Quality Assurance: Recommending improvements in quality assurance mechanisms, such as regular program reviews and accreditation processes, to ensure high-quality education.
Accessibility and Inclusivity: Advising on strategies to improve access to higher education for underrepresented groups and enhance inclusivity on campuses.
Resource Allocation: Recommending effective resource allocation strategies, which may include consolidating programs or services that are underutilized or redundant.
Transparency and Reporting: Encouraging universities to be transparent about their performance and publish data related to student outcomes, satisfaction, and financial management.
Collaboration: Promoting collaboration between universities and research institutions to enhance research productivity and share resources.
By conducting thorough assessments and making data-driven recommendations, the Productivity Commission helps tertiary education organizations become more efficient, deliver higher-quality education, and manage costs effectively, contributing to a more productive education sector.
Evaluating Government Performance: Methods for Research and Analysis
Research and analysis to assess the performance of government entities, often referred to as government performance evaluation or assessment, is a crucial process that helps ensure transparency, accountability, and efficient service delivery. The goal is to determine how well government agencies or departments are achieving their objectives and serving the public interest. Here's an overview of the process:
1. Setting Objectives and Performance Metrics:
Define clear and measurable objectives for government agencies. These objectives should align with government policies, public expectations, and the needs of the community.
Develop performance metrics and key performance indicators (KPIs) to evaluate the success of government programs and services.
2. Data Collection:
Gather data related to government agency performance. This data can include financial reports, service delivery data, citizen feedback, and more.
Use surveys, interviews, and other research methods to collect qualitative and quantitative data.
3. Analysis and Evaluation:
Analyze the collected data to assess government performance. Look for patterns, trends, strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement.
Use statistical and analytical tools to interpret the data.
4. Benchmarking:
Compare government performance against benchmarks and best practices. This can involve comparing government agencies to one another or to similar agencies in other regions or countries.
5. Reporting and Transparency:
Prepare reports that communicate the findings and insights regarding government performance to relevant stakeholders, including the public.
Transparency is essential to maintain trust in government entities.
6. Policy Recommendations:
Based on the research and analysis, develop policy recommendations and action plans to address areas of poor performance or to enhance efficiency.
These recommendations may include changes in resource allocation, process improvements, and policy reforms.
7. Continuous Improvement:
Government performance assessment is an ongoing process. Regular reviews and updates should occur to ensure that agencies continue to improve and deliver quality services.
8. Public Engagement:
Involve the public in the assessment process by seeking their input, conducting public hearings, and encouraging citizen feedback. Public engagement is critical to understanding the real impact of government policies.
9. Implementation and Monitoring:
Once recommendations are accepted, they should be implemented and monitored for effectiveness.
Adaptation and refinement of policies and processes may be required over time.
Government performance assessment contributes to better governance, increased accountability, and improved public services. It helps government entities align their actions with their objectives and address the needs of the citizens they serve.
Assessing Government Performance: Evaluating the Efficiency and Effectiveness
Government performance evaluation or assessment is the systematic process of examining the efficiency, effectiveness, and impact of government agencies, programs, and services. This evaluation is conducted to gauge how well these entities are delivering on their objectives and missions and to identify areas for improvement. Here are key aspects of government performance evaluation:
Objective Setting: Government entities set clear objectives and goals that align with their mandates and serve the public interest. These objectives define what the agency aims to achieve.
Performance Metrics: Specific performance metrics and key performance indicators (KPIs) are established to measure success. These metrics can include financial indicators, service quality measures, timeliness, and more.
Data Collection: Data is gathered through various means, including financial reports, operational data, surveys, and feedback from citizens and stakeholders. Qualitative and quantitative data are collected to provide a comprehensive view of performance.
Analysis and Evaluation: Skilled analysts assess the collected data to evaluate performance. They look for trends, strengths, weaknesses, and areas that need attention. Advanced analytical tools may be used for in-depth analysis.
Benchmarking: Comparison is made with similar government agencies or international best practices to assess how the agency fares in comparison to its peers.
Reporting: The findings of the assessment are documented in reports. These reports highlight performance trends, achievements, and areas for improvement. They are typically shared with relevant stakeholders and may be made available to the public to ensure transparency.
Policy Recommendations: Based on the evaluation, recommendations are developed. These recommendations may include changes in resource allocation, process improvements, or policy adjustments to address areas of poor performance.
Continuous Improvement: Government performance evaluation is an ongoing process. Regular reviews are conducted to ensure that government entities are continuously improving their operations and services.
Public Engagement: The public, as key stakeholders, is often involved in the evaluation process. Their feedback, expectations, and experiences provide valuable insights into government performance.
Monitoring and Implementation: Accepted recommendations are implemented and monitored for effectiveness. This may involve adapting policies and processes over time to ensure improvements are sustained.
Government performance evaluation helps ensure that government agencies are accountable, transparent, and responsive to the needs of the public. It plays a vital role in driving improvements in service delivery, resource allocation, and public policy.
Leveraging Australia's Productivity Commission Expertise for Enhanced Organizational Performance in Kuwait
Benefiting from Australia's Productivity Commission to enhance organizational performance in Kuwait can be a valuable endeavor. Here are some steps and strategies:
Collaborative Partnerships: Kuwait can establish collaborative partnerships with the Productivity Commission or similar Australian government agencies. This could involve formal agreements or memoranda of understanding to facilitate knowledge sharing and cooperation.
Knowledge Transfer: Kuwait can seek knowledge transfer programs where experts from the Productivity Commission provide training, workshops, or advisory services to Kuwaiti government agencies and organizations.
Study Tours: Kuwaiti officials and professionals can participate in study tours to Australia to observe best practices and strategies employed by the Productivity Commission and other Australian organizations.
Research and Analysis: Kuwait can engage the Productivity Commission to conduct specific research and analysis on organizational performance improvement. This could include sector-specific studies or benchmarking exercises.
Policy Recommendations: Kuwait can explore opportunities to adopt some of the policy recommendations and practices suggested by the Productivity Commission. Tailoring these recommendations to the Kuwaiti context is crucial.
Capacity Building: Invest in capacity building programs and training for Kuwaiti professionals in areas related to organizational performance, efficiency, and productivity improvement.
Data and Metrics: Establish or enhance data collection and performance metrics in government and public sector organizations, following the Australian model of data-driven decision-making.
Institutional Reform: Consider adopting some of the institutional reforms and mechanisms employed by the Productivity Commission to drive efficiency and effectiveness in the public sector.
Policy Dialogue: Foster a policy dialogue between Kuwaiti government officials, academics, and experts, and counterparts in Australia to discuss challenges and solutions related to organizational performance.
Government Support: Encourage strong government support for initiatives related to enhancing organizational performance. This can involve dedicated budget allocation and political will.
Feedback Mechanisms: Develop feedback mechanisms and platforms for organizations and the public to provide input on government performance, similar to the Productivity Commission's public consultation processes.
Sector-Specific Initiatives: Focus on specific sectors that are priorities for Kuwait and tailor improvement initiatives accordingly. For example, healthcare, education, and infrastructure are often key areas of interest.
Long-Term Commitment: Recognize that improving organizational performance is a long-term commitment that requires sustained effort and continuous improvement.
It's important to adapt and implement best practices from Australia's Productivity Commission while considering Kuwait's unique cultural, economic, and political context. This process can significantly contribute to enhancing organizational performance in Kuwait.
End,,,
Dr. Jasem Yousef AlFahad
PhD in Code (Regulation) Development & Compliance An expert in studies, systems, codes, and implementation CEO of the Professional Consultants Club Email: ceo@consult-club.com
Mobile: +965 99222094
أطلب خدمات واستشارات تكملة الماجستير والدكتوراه
البرنامج التطبيقي الشامل للإعداد المستشارين المحترفين
The Comprehensive Training Program to Prepare Professional Consultants
رابط البرنامج: